What to make of Chicago White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf meeting with Nashville mayor

CHICAGO, IL - MAY 05: Chairman and owner Jerry Reinsdorf of the Chicago White Sox (L) talks with Rob Manfred, commissioner of the baseball, before a game between the White Sox and the Boston Red Sox at U.S. Cellular Field on May 5, 2016 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)
CHICAGO, IL - MAY 05: Chairman and owner Jerry Reinsdorf of the Chicago White Sox (L) talks with Rob Manfred, commissioner of the baseball, before a game between the White Sox and the Boston Red Sox at U.S. Cellular Field on May 5, 2016 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 3
Next
Credit: Kamil Krzaczynski-USA TODAY Sports
Credit: Kamil Krzaczynski-USA TODAY Sports /

Does it make sense for the team to leave Chicago?

On one hand, going to Nashville means not having to share a market. On the other hand, it would be a major step down in market size.

The Chicago White Sox have found a way to exist for nearly 125 years and have a fanbase despite having to compete with the Chicago Cubs for attention. Chicago does lean towards the Cubs, but there are still plenty of people to draw enough revenue to support a sports business.

At the same time, Nashville’s population continues to grow, so the market size could be different in six years when the lease expires at Guaranteed Rate Field.

There is still an opportunity for Reinsdorf or a new owner to create revenue opportunities with the new stadium in Chicago.

They have been reported to be looking at moving out to Arlington Heights with the Chicago Bears (that is if the Bears move). The team has also been speculated to take over the land at Soldier Field if the Bears leave the city. The Sox might also move to a location near the United Center.

Leaving Chicago might be the only Reinsdorf can avoid having to put any of his money into a new stadium. Another city desperate for an MLB team might be willing to offer a blank check.